Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:44 am
” ODonnell v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
KG (IPKat) (Class 46) CFI: Frag Comercio Internacional, SL v OHIM, Tinkerbell Modas LTDA – Have you ever seen two less likely allegedly similar marks? [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:30 am
Such forum selection provisions—known as federal forum provisions or FFPs—were broadly implemented in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:30 am
Such forum selection provisions—known as federal forum provisions or FFPs—were broadly implemented in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm
Tex. 1969); United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
The allegedly infringed artwork had registered with the United States Copyright Office prior to the creation by the league of the Gull logo and the allegedly infringed logo and the acquired logo appeared to be exactly the same. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: False marking intent to deceive may be inferred from marking of expired patent numbers: Patent Compliance Group Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:01 pm
Lehman Brothers’ failure resulted in the largest bankruptcy filing in United States history. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:47 am
BACKGROUND: Plaintiff Butte Environmental Council filed a complaint against Defendants United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”). [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:06 am
The United States Supreme Court is already considering a related issue, the extent of immunity for prosecutors who fabricate evidence, in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 12:48 pm
Number Word Mark 6171625 GANT COIN 6186820 GRASTON 6185288 ACTIVE CARE 6184959 A&A SURFACES 6184958 A&A SURFACES 6184505 SERENSNIPPITY ORGANIC INSPIRED HAIR SALON 6184477 LEGAL SOLUTIONS, PRACTICAL ADVICE 6184413 MARCH MADNESS 6184187 COMMAND GRILLE 6184171 JAVA WAVE 6184117 LUMALUXE 6183997 ZAAD 6186996 INDY HEMATOLOGY EDUCATION 6186778 RECYCLED WEALTH 6183837 COOL SCIENCE MATTERS 6183734 MARINE 31 6183733 MARINE 31 6186699 ESPERTA 6186975 REAL. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 3:24 pm
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 23-24 (2005) (quoting United States v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:05 pm
The best ones outside of the United States are in Dubai and Amsterdam. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
United States, 371 U.S. 156, 167 (1962) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:13 pm
§ 1605.1 (citing United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:39 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:39 pm
The Respondent Admitted that he wasn’t using the mark MYUNDIES with the clothing items specified in his application on the date he filed it with the United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
