Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Doe" Results 4681 - 4700 of 19,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2016, 7:18 am by Benjamin Wittes
No matter how terribly the government behaves, the overwhelming bulk of what it does will be unconnected to the bad stuff. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The court added that the phrase “material fact in connection with the purchase or sale” “suggests a connection that matters. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 2:42 pm by Myers Freelance
It is now up to the states to adopt the ABA’s changes, reject them, or take them on in some modified form. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am by Florian Mueller
""The Federal Circuit's interpretation of Section 289, however, does exactly what Congress is not allowed to do. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 5:32 am by Neil H. Buchanan
 Why is that news, and for that matter, why is it merely an estimate? [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:37 am by Maya Angenot
Duncan’s adopted argument and his volume of internet-driven gibberish made me wonder if, for some reason, the gods had me in their cross-hairs ». [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Today, virtually all surrogacy arrangements are “gestational,” meaning that the woman who carries the baby does not provide the egg for conception. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:02 am by Cyberleagle
Does the likelihood of the post being blocked have to be considered? [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
" No matter our feelings on the matter, the sweep of Washington's law limits speech motivated by the teachings of several of the world's major religions. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
It’s unclear what portion of the health-care workforce would be covered, were the FTC to adopt the rule as proposed, and were the rule sustained. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
But impressions matter. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
But that court does not undertake the fact finding and determination of the matter. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
As a matter of history, Justice Scalia is almost certainly correct about sexual orientation as such, but his position is somewhat overstated with respect to sex. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:36 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
by Kevin Jon Heller I’ve long thought that any scholar who wants to maintain his or her credibility should stay far away from the US government, no matter which party is in power. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:33 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This authority permits federal courts to handle a range of matters, big and small, that fall in the gaps of governing statutes and formally adopted procedural rules. . . .But here, the First Circuit did not adopt a rule regulating its own proceedings—it adopted a blanket rule that all district courts in its jurisdiction must follow on pain of reversal. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
If we could go behind the philosopher John Rawls’s “veil of ignorance,” without knowledge of the political affiliation of the president or the House leaders, what neutral principles would we adopt about impeachment, executive privilege and obstruction? [read post]