Search for: "People v. White" Results 4681 - 4700 of 7,177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2013, 11:41 am by Gene Quinn
In my opinion, there are abusers on both sides of the “v” in litigation. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by Michelle N. Meyer
It's just not the case, for example, that Zimmerman called the police about dozens of suspicious black men and never about white men. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:07 am by Devlin Hartline
”4 The requirement of a signed writing “is not only designed to protect people against false claims of oral agreements,” but it also serves “to make the ownership of property rights in intellectual property clear and definite, so that such property will be readily marketable. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
  He began his analysis of the 4th Amendment issues by noting that it guarantees that people shall be `secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:40 am by Jon Hyman
A comment that his mother was Indian and not allowed to sit with White people back in the day. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:40 am by Jon Hyman
A comment that his mother was Indian and not allowed to sit with White people back in the day. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Patrick Maines
 How, for instance, would one popularize such issues as the district and appellate court rulings in Viacom v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
” It was long assumed that the right to jury trial meant the right to a jury of 12 persons (originally, white men). [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:27 am by Joey Fishkin
 Contrast, unfortunately, the Medicaid expansion: Congress did not anticipate the Court’s Spending Clause holding in NFIB v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 3:47 pm
The language used was that specifically suggested by the Court of Appeals in the case of People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by Tammy Binford
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Noel Canning v. [read post]