Search for: "STATE v MILLER" Results 4681 - 4700 of 5,892
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:12 am by John Floyd
In 2013, the Supreme Court let stand a 10-2 Louisiana jury verdict in the case of Miller v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]