Search for: "State v. Main" Results 4681 - 4700 of 11,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
By Amanda Maine, J.D.A divided panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the lower court and Bank of America in holding that certain banking fees charged but not disclosed amounted to an omission of material fact, and therefore the plaintiff’s state law claims of breach of contract and fiduciary duty were preempted by SLUSA and must be brought in federal court (Goldberg v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:51 am
 This was - in a nutshell - the issue on which the Polish Supreme Court had sought guidance from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in OTK v SFP, C-367/15.This morning, contrary to the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston, the CJEU answered in the negative, holding that [para 28] "the fact that Directive 2004/48 does not entail an obligation on the Member States to provide for ‘punitive’ damages cannot be… [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm by Giles Peaker
The question, in large part, was the significance of Lord Neuberger’s judgment in Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council; Kanu v Southwark London Borough Council [2016] AC 811, at paras 78 and 79 “78. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 11:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The duration 1855 to 1870 hardly qualifies as an example of simultaneous independent invention.Details taken from https://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php? [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:58 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Miami, FL, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Chief Justice Hughes in the 1932 case Crowell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 1:59 pm
Finally, she stated that `I would like to mention that on 8/29/16 Nicholas [sic] also told me that he was going after my brother Ronald Butera’.People v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Lee v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 2:23 pm
 At Bell's trial, the main disputed issue was the value of the computer — if the value equaled or exceeded $500, the charge was a felony, if less, a misdemeanor.Bell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 11:10 am by Julian Ku
Supreme Court confirmed that Congress cannot restrict this power in the 2015 decision Zivotofsky v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Giles Peaker
Ealing refused the referral, stating this authority is satisfied that the conditions of referral are met as the family have a local connection with us on grounds of residence. [read post]