Search for: "State v. So "
Results 4681 - 4700
of 117,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2023, 9:34 am
In Premier Restoration LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:04 am
Supreme Court in Apple v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:30 am
Prill v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:46 am
Road Accident Fund v Discovery Health (Pty) Ltd and Minister of Transport (CCT 106/23) [2023] [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
For example, all 50 states require reporting of data breaches to affected consumers, and many separately require reporting to state Attorneys General, but in circumstances that vary among the states in terms of the nature of compromised data that triggers notification, the content of the required notice, and the timing in which notice must be provided. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
Funny ones really. 00:35:19 gretchen desutter: A favorite scene with Monica was a Twins v Yankees game. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:13 am
For example, in Unico Mechanical Corporation, the GAO sustained the protest where the agency unreasonably assessed a weakness (1) notwithstanding the proposal met the solicitation’s stated minimum requirement, and (2) for a mistaken finding that the offeror did not address a feature in its proposal. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
Is it score-settling: "Hey libs, your beloved Social Security is super-askew because you were so eager to kill so many babies! [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
Marina Coast Water District v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:30 am
In addition, intelligence and law enforcement agencies have increasingly used specious legal reasoning and deep pockets to buy their way around Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
That standard gives state courts, including the state appellate courts which can independently review the convictions, some leeway to interpret the Constitution so long as they do not run afoul of specific Supreme Court holdings. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
V. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 4:58 am
Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
"That the ramp was intended for the transport of materials, and was not a substitute for a ladder or scaffold, was of “no moment,” as the operative consideration was whether “the ramp covered a significant elevation differential,” and since it did so here, the AD1 agreed that, absent the appropriate protections, liability attached.Looks like this case just got a bit more elevated …# # #DECISIONL. v Whitestar Consulting & Contr., Inc. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 12:30 am
Dobbs argued that its use of state-counting in 1868 to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment’s liberty guarantee provided an impersonal standard that prevented interpreters from reasoning from their values and so protected democracy in the states. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm
Chisolm v. [read post]
