Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 7,338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2012, 2:39 pm
“It does take longer here,” said P.M. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
So, how does it fare on the “novel” front? [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:35 pm
Moore's argument is based on the idea that an assertion that "x is good" if and only if "x is pleasurable" is a claim about meaning. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:28 am
Not only does he know the law but lives by the law. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
You can’t see a headache, dizziness, or anxiety, on an x-ray or an MRI. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:20 pm
What does the ideal investor look like to you? [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Utah law does not preclude strict liability design defect claims against medical product manufacturers.2012 WL 33360, at *5 n.6. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:04 pm
Presenting the figures in this way is a bit like watching X-Factor from the live finals, which begin with 12 contestants, and extrapolating that since one of them wins in the end, therefore almost 10% of X-Factor applicants ultimately win the contest. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:55 am
Below I have set forth excerpts from this remarkable prosecution and conviction. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:21 pm
Recently, I was asked: "If you could negotiate any terms up front, what would be the key ones? [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
The V2/V1 values smaller than 50% mentioned in D2 (tables I and II) only concern the comparative products (“PC1” and “PC2”) and do not disclose the whole set of features of the product according to claim 1 of the patent under consideration […].[15.1.1] According to the established case law of the Boards of appeal, including decision T 240/95 [4.2, 3rd §], a numerical range expressed as “from x to y” effectively constitutes a… [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
How does the order differ from the model order? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:15 pm
I pointed out to the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:12 pm
This certainly does not appear to be a big deal. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:06 am
FW: Defendants’ Petition for Certiorari in Milward – DENIED Inbox x Nathan A. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:42 pm
On one view, of course it does not. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:10 pm
(which does happen). [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 2:04 am
The reporter promised X his undertaking of confidentiality would remain so long as McIntosh was convinced that X had not deliberately misled him. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:27 pm
The current draft minutes (from the December 2011 meeting) are dense, informative, and dare I say absorbing. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:26 am
It is not a violation of the state’s criminal laws for 40 a patient or primary caregiver to engage or assist in the 41 medical use of cannabis pursuant to this section, except as 42 otherwise provided in subsections (g) and (i). 43 (c)? [read post]