Search for: "IN RE JONES" Results 4701 - 4720 of 4,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
It seems that every day there is yet another story in the business pages about a significant data breach at a major company. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:39 am by Lovechilde
"The moment you start a recall," he told me, "you're playing their game by their rules. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 12:23 pm by Sasha Volokh
Suppose you're a private-university president who wants to have affirmative action for faculty hiring or student admissions (or both). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
"The Emergence of a Human Right to Water and Sanitation: The Many Challenges": Audrey Gaughran (Amnesty International) and Patricia Jones (Environmental Justice Program, Unitarian Universalist Service Committee).Thursday, March 29, 11:30 a.m.-1 p.m.? [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:53 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
So, I may have several search strings like: Smith AND [misappropriat* OR stole OR steal* OR (customer w/3 list) OR (client w/3 list) OR fire OR terminat* OR discipline* OR suspend* OR resign* OR unemploy*] between 1/1/08-1/1/10 (Kennedy OR Jones OR Adams) AND (fire OR terminat* OR discipline* OR suspend*) between 9/15/09-10/15/09 Smith AND [perform! [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The defendant appealed to the High court and Kerr J allowed the appeal on the basis that the claim was an abuse of process as it constituted an attempt to re-litigate issues previously determined and undermine the claimant’s criminal convictions. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 2:50 am
" Freddy Jones and Sergio Rodriguez turned in B to B-minus performances; sparkling they weren't. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 4:13 am by INFORRM
Playing an amateur detective can get you into all sorts of trouble and that’s not what we’re about. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
” Illegality (and violation of public policy) doctrine In determining that there was a strong public policy against racial discrimination, the Court in Bob Jones considered the unanimous decisions from all three branches of the federal government. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
When the panel was asked how they dealt with scientific issues, Judge Saris discussed her presiding over In re Neurontin, which was a “big challenge for me to understand,” with no randomized trials or objective assessments by the litigants.[3] Judge Vance discussed her experience of presiding in a low-level benzene exposure case, in which plaintiff claimed that his acute myelogenous leukemia was caused by gasoline.[4] Perhaps the key difference in approach to Rule 702 emerged… [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am by Fred Goldsmith
Maddux claimed Maersk Line, Limited Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc. are vicariously liable for his injuries pursuant to the Jones Act, the Public Vessels Act, the Suits in Admiralty Act and the general maritime law of the United States, or alternatively Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
But at a deeper level, I think we're all here for a more profound reason. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
Jones Brokerage - Residential Jason Aramburu Investor / Owner Abigail Cohen Urban Planning Peter Calatozzo Legal Carmelo Failla Acquisitions Acheson Doyle Partne Architecture Lou Martino Architecture Dianne Henning Brokerage - Residential Brian Lake Investor / Owner Bryant Roman Brokerage - Residential Catherine Molina Brokerage - Residential Steven Roman Brokerage - Residential david rosenberg Legal Jeffrey Diamond Legal Steve Birnhak… [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
If you’re the Tuscaloosa Police Department (TPD), you might suddenly start giving her poor evaluations, refer to her behind her back with gendered slurs, or tell her could just patrol the streets without a bullet-proof vest if the assigned one could not be used while she was lactating. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Sometimes legal counsel take positions in court determined solely by the expediency of what expert witnesses are available, and what opinions are held by those witnesses. [read post]