Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 4701 - 4720 of 120,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2015, 10:49 am by MBettman
Meyers, 419 U.S. 449 (1975) (The privilege against self-incrimination may only be invoked when an individual reasonably believes the testimony may be used against him in a criminal prosecution.) [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  We have made it clear that while a plaintiff may not use the UCL to “plead around” an absolute bar to relief, the UIPA does not immunize insurers from UCL liability for conduct that violates other laws in addition to the UIPA. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLP By Michele Haydel Gehrke In a decision significant for employers with Bring Your Own Device (“BYOD”) policies, a California Court of Appeal held in Cochran v. [read post]
The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit overturned the federal district court’s decision stating that the Supreme Court in Dobbs “makes clear that no right to abortion exists under the Constitution, so Georgia may prohibit them. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:18 am by John Lindsay
35 U.S.C. 101 – Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof,  may obtain a patent therefore, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm
 So it may perhaps be that it takes more cocaine to put you where you want to be than it does meth. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A public officer of a town, village, improvement district or fire district   officer by court may be removed from his or her office pursuant to Public Officers Law §36Becallo v Zambrano, 2015 NY Slip Op 07091, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentPublic Officers Law §36 was enacted to enable a town, a village, an improvement district or a fire district to remove a public officer found to be an unfaithful or dishonest public official. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:23 am by David Hansen, JD
I do, but mostly for the fair use case that it precipitated, Sony Corp. v. [read post]