Search for: "POST PROPERTIES, INC."
Results 4701 - 4720
of 9,323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
Were you away last week or just too busy with the end-of-year work madness, and missed your regular dose of IPKat posts? [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:21 am
Google, Inc., 2015 WL 7753406, No. 15-cv-03221 (N.D. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:09 am
” [Again, this is a classic example of letting property rhetoric distort analysis—yet so unnecessary to the outcome! [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 8:32 pm
CHL is a service of Red Arch Cultural Heritage Law & Policy Research, Inc. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm
AT&T, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
” Next up is CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 11:04 am
The AmeriKat in her post-lunchslump on most days...but not today! [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 1:57 pm
The Haunted Hotel, Inc., the plaintiff visited the defendant’s haunted attraction with a group of friends. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:35 am
The court ruled that Section 365(n) therefore does not protect Mission’s trademark license post-rejection. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:35 am
The court ruled that Section 365(n) therefore does not protect Mission’s trademark license post-rejection. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:22 am
Consequently, the court refused to allow the employer to file yet another amended complaint, instead dismissing the operative complaint with prejudice (Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 12:12 pm
Sam English Grading, Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:42 am
Pinnacle Exhibits, Inc., No. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
, pens this post about the well-known and much-debated issue of the product plain packaging [on which see earlier Katposts here, here, here, and here].* Court of Appeal dismisses Rovi's claim construction attempt in battle with VirginA few days ago the Court of Appeal of England and Wales handed down its decision in Rovi Guides Inc v Virgin Media Ltd & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 1214. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 10:40 am
Nucor Steel Marion, Inc., Case No. 3:13 CV 137, 2015 WL 6872511 (N.D. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 7:44 am
For now, we only need the basic name (e.g, “Nike,” not “Nike, Inc. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
(I need to preface this post with a caveat: It is very long because it addresses difficult issues involved in deciding when a Public Records Act applies to a state employee's use of his/her cell phone to conduct official business. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 10:02 pm
Originally posted 2011-09-28 10:33:30. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:53 pm
Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 8:12 am
When you agree to something, you should stick to it, but there are some grey areas and possible (unintentional) overlap post-settlement of any disputes. [read post]
