Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples" Results 4701 - 4720 of 72,916
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2006, 11:56 am
In some cases, this can have very important practical implications on the rights of the people involved.In Air Canada v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:26 pm by Charles Bieneman
  This is an important statement because many people, such as the majority of the Federal Circuit panel in MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:13 pm by Rob Sachs
 For many people who may have spoken with a Michigan lawyer before July 31, 2010, and were told you had no case, the law has now changed and many people now have important legal rights restored. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm
You'd think that if you were in the process of trying to get a teaching job in the public schools, you could keep to yourself -- or at least not express to the people reviewing your suitability for the job - that you think that the age of consent should be zero, that online child predation should be legal, that most students with disabilities are "faking" it, that there's no substantial benefit to mainstreaming disabled students, that you think about suicide "every… [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:17 pm by Christopher Zorn
As people probably know by now, today a three-judge panel struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:53 am
As the post points out, trial lawyers are fantastic at getting 12 people in a jury to understand even the most complex issues, and to decide in thier favor. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Maggie Blackhawk (University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School) has posted "On Power & the Law: McGirt v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:25 am
Isn't one point -- indeed, a central point -- of having a judiciary to convince people not to engage in self-help remedies? [read post]