Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 17,272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2018, 7:06 am
The court ultimately concluded that the disappointing sales numbers and resulting stock price drop were more plausibly related to customer reaction to the company's public relations issues than its accounting practices (Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
To the extent that our earlier decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:49 am
Coffee was convicted of four counts of theft by shoplifting at a Walmart. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 4:08 am
Miriam Siefert analyzes Wednesday’s argument in Knick v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
” In People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 10:15 am
Disgorgement is often the surest way to restore investors’ losses, Peikin explained, but the Supreme Court ruling in Kokesh v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:31 am
In Clark and Biddle v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:30 am
Alliant-v-Tribal-Complaint [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:50 am
The amendments made it clearer that the specifically identified list of things that qualify as personal information only count if they meet the general definition of personal information (1798.140(o)). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:36 am
Notably, in the Sabarimala judgement, Justice Chandrachud observed that the rationale used by the Bombay High Court in Narasu Appa Mali v State of Bombay, which held that personal laws should not be subject to fundamental rights, is not sustainable. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:35 pm
Knick v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
Stitt, consolidated for argument with United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 9:14 am
So the preview in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:35 am
The mortgage stated that the loan was insured by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”). [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:25 am
See Larson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:50 pm
Moreland filed a civil suit, which included a count by Ms. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:40 am
The key language of the agreement stated: Throughout the term of this Agreement [Patrick] shall not be entitled to exercise any voting and/or consensual rights and powers relating or pertaining to the [stock] or any part thereof for any purpose. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 8:57 pm
In R. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:56 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
