Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 22,145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2011, 4:18 pm
Oil Trading, LLC v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 3:09 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 8:44 am
The order can be found at Wheaton Coll. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:59 am
Class v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am
San Francisco Tomorrow, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:19 pm
Filburn, Lopez, and United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:23 am
Twombly, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1974 (2007) (stating that the plaintiff must plead "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face"); Cress v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:49 am
If, on the other hand, the police acted without a warrant, the burden of proof is on the prosecution. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 2:09 pm
Here's how this played out in today's Florida Court of Appeals decision in Ronchi v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 8:07 pm
As for the burden side of the equation - how much of a burden is an ID requirement? [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 12:27 pm
Paz v. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:27 am
Instead, a more lenient test that balances burdens against public benefits, as articulated in Pike v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 5:30 am
"Citing Matter of Dingee v DiNapoli, 56 AD3d 876, the Appellate Division observed that "[i]n determining whether a person is permanently disabled, [the Comptroller] may consider whether proper medical treatment is reasonably and safely available to correct the disability. [read post]
1 May 2025, 4:00 am
In Willey v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
The Comptroller has exclusive authority to determine the validity of a beneficiary designation on an application for death benefits, which determination must be supported by substantial evidenceClose v Nitido, 2016 NY Slip Op 00407, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentEric M. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 9:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
Fyffe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:30 am
The court says it meets the burden. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:58 am
A 2008 Jefferson Parish case, Thibodeaux v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 7:15 am
The group said its members would bear the adverse consequences of striking the preemption provision, a result sought by the states of Montana and Massachusetts in their suit against the SEC (Lindeen v. [read post]
