Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 4701 - 4720 of 15,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court observed that foster parents apply for the subsidy prior to adoption (18 NYCRR 421.24 [b], [c][1]), and sign a contract with ACS (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][3]). [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Quebec invoked it routinely under the Parti Québécois as a form of political protest, and then notably in 1988, following the Supreme Court of Canada decision Ford v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Under Internal Revenue Cоdе ѕесtіоn 6331, thе Intеrnаl Rеvеnuе Sеrvісе саn “lеvу uроn аll property and rіghtѕ to property” of a taxpayer whо оwеѕ Federal tаx. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:15 am by Wolfgang Demino
Taylor, Appellant.Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 2 of Williamson County, No. 16-0379-CC2, Honorable Laura B. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:33 pm by Daniel Nathan
The SEC also found violations of the antifraud provisions, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(b) promulgated thereunder, arising from materially false and misleading statements found on Tomahawk’s ICO website and in its white paper. [read post]
State to be used when one side claims the reasons for striking a juror are racially discriminatory: A party objecting to the other side’s use of a peremptory challenge on racial grounds must (a) make a timely objection on that basis, (b) show that the person is a member of a distinct racial group, and (c) request that the court ask the striking party its reason for the strike. [read post]
State to be used when one side claims the reasons for striking a juror are racially discriminatory: A party objecting to the other side’s use of a peremptory challenge on racial grounds must (a) make a timely objection on that basis, (b) show that the person is a member of a distinct racial group, and (c) request that the court ask the striking party its reason for the strike. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the president’s subordinates were enjoined from implementing or giving effect to: Executive Order 13,836 Sections 5(a) 5(e), and 6; Executive Order 13,837 Sections 3(a), 4(a), and 4(b); and Executive Order 13,839 Sections 3, 4(a), and 4(c) (American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:24 am by JEMIMA LOVATT
Art 6.3(c) states that every defendant to a criminal charge has the right to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Thе IRS wіll fіlе a Cеrtіfісаtе of Rеlеаѕе of Fеdеrаl Tаx Lien wіth bоth ѕtаtе аnd local аuthоrіtіеѕ. [read post]