Search for: "Action Communications Inc" Results 4721 - 4740 of 10,899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Following negotiations with GoDaddy, Drazen, Bennett, and Herrick submitted a proposed class settlement agreement that defined the class, in part, as: All persons within the United States to whom, from November 4, 2014 through December 31, 2016, Defendant placed a voice or text message call to their cellular telephone pursuant to an outbound campaign facilitated by the web-based software application used by 3Seventy, Inc., or the software programs and platforms that comprise the Cisco… [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:55 am by WIMS
(c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:32 am by WIMS
Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:08 am by Epstein Becker Green
CVS More recently, in February 2014, the EEOC filed a complaint against CVS Pharmacy, Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:02 am by Leah Williams
Similarly, the fact that the protected communication contained swear words and insults was insufficient to render the communication unprotected. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am by Schachtman
Leinweber Co., Inc., Driv-Lok, Inc., Ford Motor Co., and ExxonMobil Oil Corp. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While counsel’s communications and statements surrounding the withdrawal of the action filed in New York, which we assume to be true on a CPLR 3211 (a)(7) motion, and defendants’ subsequent reliance on said withdrawal in a California action, are troubling, the complaint fails to allege damages proximately caused by the alleged deceit (see Doscher v Mannatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, 148 AD3d 523, 524 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
Defendant's actions and statements had the specific intent to communicate to the world that Plaintiff is a hacker. [29.] [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeGuidelines §3553(a) Factors, Justice Due Defendant, Community Cited in Re-Sentence to 30 Years in Prison United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:04 pm by James Yang
In Aspex Eyewear Inc. v Clariti Eyewear, the patentee was estopped (i.e., prevented) from suing the alleged infringer. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:06 am by Amy Howe
., a case involving the Class Action Fairness Act. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 1:47 pm by jblock
In February 2009, Woodcock Washburn successfully defended an action for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract and unfair trade practices on behalf of its client Illinois Tool Works, Inc., Trident Division in an action filed in Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven. [read post]