Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 10,981
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Ninth Circuit Requires Proof of “But For” Causation for Claims Under Americans with Disabilities Act
22 Aug 2019, 9:04 am
California courts have interpreted this to require proof the disability was a substantial motivating factor behind the discrimination, rather than simply a motivating factor. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Requires Proof of “But For” Causation for Claims Under Americans with Disabilities Act
22 Aug 2019, 9:04 am
California courts have interpreted this to require proof the disability was a substantial motivating factor behind the discrimination, rather than simply a motivating factor. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:27 am
Batalden was appointed by the State Bar of California to its Standing Committee on the Federal Courts. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 11:08 am
We want the court to protect our privacy and establish that the bar is high for the police to retain personal information. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:54 am
A federal district court would not have subject-matter jurisdiction to hear the state-law claims (which could be heard by a California state court) but would have jurisdiction to hear the three federal claims. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 1:02 pm
Superior Ct. of California, Cnty. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court and reinstated his conviction. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:58 am
OrbisDefendant ORBIS Corporation (“ORBIS”) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the South- ern District of Ohio denying its motion for fees, costs, reasonable attorney fees, and expenses. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:00 pm
He pursued, however, and the matter is now before the California Supreme Court, after a 10 day confidential bar trial. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
The Dorsett court states: "Defendant cites to no authority compelling the conclusion that the change-in-law analysis. . .requires an existing, contrary California precedent. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:31 am
Todd Smith of the Texas Appellate Law Blog and Greg May of the California Blog of Appeal for example. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
One California-based firm, Gibson Dunn, did offer O’Connor a job – as a legal secretary. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:42 am
Telling the court that California’s regulation of eggs has “inflated egg prices for every egg consumer in the Nation,” 13 states argue that the law is trumped by federal laws and violates the Constitution’s commerce clause, which prohibits states from enacting laws that are intended to discriminate against citizens of other states or that place an unnecessary burden on interstate commerce. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 2:07 pm
It seems likely that Morgan Drexen will ask the California federal court for a stay of proceedings pending a ruling by the Washington, D.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 7:17 pm
The state courts reject your appeal. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:09 am
Supreme Court, the 13 U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm
Supreme Court reversed, stating that, assuming that Biological Father is a “parent” under the ICWA, that law does not bar termination of his parental rights. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
The trial court, adopting the State's response, ruled the issue was barred by the law of the case doctrine. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:04 pm
(California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
