Search for: "MATTER OF D S N"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 5,780
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Part III of The Constitutional Crisis in ECUSA: "If You Want Our Voice, Then We're Giving It to You"
16 Oct 2010, 12:52 am
" And according to Canon IV.17.2, "[i]n all matters" in which a bishop is the subject of Title IV proceedings, the term "Bishop Diocesan" shall mean the Presiding Bishop. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
” Since this was a matter of first impression in Delaware, there was no precedent for the Court to analyze, so the Court turned to the language of Airgas’s charter and bylaw provisions. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 10:02 am
If you’d like to read more about this case, check out the Wikipedia entry on Sergey Aleynikov. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am
You might expect that, as defense attorneys, we’d think a lot more highly of SMW II than we did of SMW I.You’d be right. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:41 am
According to Solvay, the district court erred when it “decline[d] to read the ‘originality’ requirement of § 102(f) into § 102(g). [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
In Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
Shining the Spotlight on Trademark Bullies (a Long-Delayed Recap of a Trademark Scholars Roundtable)
13 Oct 2010, 10:16 am
First, if the private adjudicators adopt private rules that are more regressive than trademark law, the statute's doctrinal boundaries matter less. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
However, the Court of Appeal decided that a) the matter was of wider public interest and b) given that the appellant’s current AST was shortly to end, there was a [surely slim] possibility that Enfield would find that the chain of causation hadn’t been broken and that the appellant and his wife remained intentionally homeless, as per their review decision under appeal. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
Regan’s suspended sentence on another matter after he was accused of fourth degree assault and criminal trespass, despite the fact that he was acquitted of both crimes. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am
I thought I’d write to you with a couple of points: 1. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
” B-o-l-o-g-n-a. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
A fact is material "if it `might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law,'" and "[a]n issue of fact is `genuine' if `the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.'" Holtz v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:41 am
C-O-N-D-O-M-I-N-I- … how d’you spell that, Hubert? [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 3:55 am
Should that be the case, Article 6(1)(a) [of the same Directive] can operate as a bar to such use being prevented only if the use by the third party of his company name or trade name is in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters".Fast-forward to April 2010 and we have the ruling of the Cour d'appel de Nancy, helpfully summarised in volume 65, no.17 of the INTA Bulletin (released 1 October 2010). [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 11:02 am
D-U-N-S Number assignment is free for all businesses required to register with the federal government for contracts or grants. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
Although Davidoff says that so matter of factly that one might assume the claim is not contestable, in fact it's not at all clear that shareholders have "the ultimate choice of when to sell the company" and its perfectly clear (at least to me) that, as a matter of policy, they should not possess that right. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:12 pm
THESE EXPLANATION–Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Sand Hill Advisors, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Due diligence matters: E D Washington decision in Pacific Coast Trailers, LLC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
Thus, if the ACS IB just advocated that “civil rights cases are different” and should be exempt from TwIqbal, we’d have let the whole thing go.But that’s not what they do. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:38 pm
In doing the legal research about the issues, I ran across the BIA's Post-Departure Bar Rule and their precedent decision in Matter of Armendarez-Mendez, 24 I&N Dec. 646 (BIA 2008) which interprets 8 C.F.R. [read post]
