Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 5,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2011, 11:03 am
As Eric Goldman has tried to educate us, using a competitor’s mark to drive traffic to a site can easily be a legitimate competitive tactic and, when it functions as comparative advertising, is not the same thing as using the mark as a mark for one’s own goods or services. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:55 am
That's a good place to start, but that's standard. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Arguably non-equivalent structures performing an equivalent function are good enough for equivalency in a means-plus-function claim. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:20 am
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
Tufty says, it's good and helpful to learn that the claimant in these proceedings is W**********. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
We’ve got corporate crises up in the C-suites and opposing counsel busting our chops in courts around the world. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:56 am
December 28, 2010).Likelihood of Confusion: The Board (here) had found likelihood of confusion due to the identity of the marks and the relatedness of the goods, despite the sophistication of the purchasers. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 3:52 am
Can anyone come up with a good one? [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 3:04 pm
This was a major decision that sparked much concern about the potential for political corruption by corporations, including non-501(c)(3) nonprofit corporations. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
Anyway, the good lady objected and maintained that, based on EU law, she was entitled to travel within the Member States of the European Union without having to change her name.. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:45 pm
Without the facts, the IPKat isn't even sure if this is the right Wintersteiger Now here's a good IP question or two for the Court of Justice of the European Union -- it's coming up in Case C-523/10 Wintersteiger [courtesy of the UK Intellectual Property Office, here] and the questions run like this: "1. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 6:45 am
Currently the review and approval test is C$299 million based on book value of assets, subject to certain exceptions. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 2:18 am
Banker and other cases on the cusp of legitimacy, is “whether the Respondent sought … to profit from the similarities between the Complainant’s mark rather than any generic meaning of the domain name. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:53 pm
§1052(d), requires that the examining attorney refuse registration when an applicant’s mark, as applied to the specified goods or services, so resembles a registered mark as to be likely to cause confusion. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:35 am
t good for growth.? [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US Trade Marks – Decisions Fraud? [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:03 am
Web page here Intellectual Property Law and Policy Volume 11, edited by Hugh C Hansen. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Brett Caraway, Digital Public Goods and the RIAA Litigation Campaign. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 pm
at 1331 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:46 am
Bush, by John Yoo: And in the opposite corner, wearing the red trunks, we find Berkeley law professor John C. [read post]
