Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 8,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
V. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
“Bill” Priestap, Sarah Raskin, Steve Ricchetti, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Gabriel Sanz-Rexach, Nathan Sheets, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Glenn Simpson, Steve Somma, Peter Strzok, Michael Sussman, Adam Szubin, Jonathan Winer, Christopher Wray, and Sally Yates.According to both President Trump (in his personal capacity) and the Solicitor General of the United States, this Judiciary Committee investigation is unconstitutional, and therefore recipients of the subpoenas need not… [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 8:00 pm
As one employer in Ontario recently discovered in Reiss v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 5:28 am
Peter Tochtermann of the Mannheim Regional Court's 7th Civil Chamber (Presiding Judge Dr. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:41 am
This is a reversal of roles from the usual perception that China is the ‘bad guy’ when it comes to IP protection.The Chinese journeyAs described by the academic Peter K. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:24 am
The Last Throes of the British Pro-Nazi Right, 1940-45), Bill V. [read post]
1 May 2018, 11:02 am
Jennifer Daskal and Peter Swire set forth recommendations for formulation and negotiation of executive agreements under Section 5 of the Cloud Act. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
”Last year the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board issued a significant panel decision, Patterson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:09 pm
”Peter Jervis, senior counsel at Rochon Genova LLP, represented potential class members before the court. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 3:22 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 10:12 pm
What makes the German S3 Graphics v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
Multiple Citizenship, Peter Spiro29. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:38 pm
”, taking place on 14 November 2018, will investigate and analyse the content and impact of the Supreme Court’s highly anticipated decision in Warner-Lambert v Mylan. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 2:42 am
Incidentally, there were three Outstanding Achievement awards this year, all thoroughly merited: Ruud Peters (Philips IP & Standards), Simon Thorley QC and Tian Lipu (SIPO). [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 8:08 am
Jen Patja Howell shared the second episode of Lawfare’s six-part “After Trump” series, featuring conversation about the problem of foreign interventions in American political campaigns: Peter Margulies examined the short- and long-term border issues facing the Biden administration, focusing on unaccompanied children and families. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 6:30 am
"-Oleg V. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 10:22 am
Jarvis, The Case of the Magician’s Assistant: McAfoos v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
Peloso, Peter Buscemi, and James D. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am
Peter Margulies analyzed a recent Ninth Circuit ruling, which said that the Trump administration's “Remain in Mexico” policy can continued—Fogel shared the full decision. [read post]
