Search for: "State of New York v. United States" Results 4721 - 4740 of 16,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2015, 7:55 am by Michael Lumer
Newton's complaint was not that New York or federal law was deficient in some way, but rather that the City of New York "undermin[ed] the State’s procedures by its recklessly chaotic evidence management system. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:55 am by Michael Lumer
Newton's complaint was not that New York or federal law was deficient in some way, but rather that the City of New York "undermin[ed] the State’s procedures by its recklessly chaotic evidence management system. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
The United States Supreme Court has held that it is unconstitutional to execute insane people who cannot understand why they are being put to death or that their execution is imminent. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 3:31 pm
" The full text of the minute order: MINUTE ORDER: In view of Defendant Jessica Cutler's notice of her Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition filing in the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Northern District of New York, this case is automatically STAYED pursuant to 11 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 2:42 am by Jeremy Saland
Crotty Saland PC is a New York criminal defense firm founded by two former Manhattan prosecutors who served in the DWI Unit. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:03 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
United States means for the future of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
  The United States Supreme Court granted cert this week in Carpenter v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The First Amendment prohibits a State’s collecting an agency shop fee from an individual on behalf of an employee organization that the individual does not wish to join or supportHarris v Quinn, USSC #11-681, decided June 30, 2014The U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:14 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeTestifying Defendant's Right to Consult Lawyer Clarified in Light of Rulings in 'Geders', 'Leeke' United States v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
” Three federal judges have already found this statute unconstitutional (see Vives v the City of New York, 305 F Supp 2d 289, 299 [SD NY 2003, Scheindlin, J.], revd on other grounds 405 F3d 115 [2d Cir 2004] ["where speech is regulated or proscribed based on its content, the scope of the effected speech must be clearly defined"]; see also Vives 405 F3d 115, 123-124 [2d Cir 2004, Cardamone, J., dissenting in part, concurring in part] [Penal Law §… [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 12:00 am
”While with the firm, Sachar successfully argued Maddicks v Big City (34 NY3d 116 [2019]) before New York’s highest court, a landmark decision establishing dismissal standards for class actions. [read post]