Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 4721 - 4740
of 7,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2009, 11:36 am
The Supreme Court set the train in motion with Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 2:29 pm
For example, in Dell Federal Systems, L.P. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:53 am
Whatever one thinks of Mitchell's reasoning, it's curious to learn that ADF again purports to find authority in Dean v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:58 am
Kevin Barrup (Marilyn Barrup, Intervenor) v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
The Supreme Court chose to refer this question to the CJEU, which replied in a decision of the 26 February 2015 (C-41/14 – Christie’s France SNC v Syndicat national des antiquaries, see previous post here). [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
In American Legion v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:02 am
The issue was squarely raised last week in Facebook v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:28 pm
Related Issues: Free SpeechInternationalRelated Cases: Kazakhstan v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:59 pm
Mr Justice Arnold seems to have heard your cries for help in handing down his decision in the latest Eli Lilly and Actavis battle concerning lung cancer treatment pemetrexed disodium. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:16 am
Come on CJEU, give us a decision which leads to a valid SPC....The AmeriKat is whiskers deep in papers at the moment, but she took a few minutes just now to have a look at this morning's latest SPC decision from the Court of Justice of the European Union in C-443/17 Abraxis v Comptroller General of Patents, which was subject to a referral made by Mr Justice Arnold on 16 March 2017 (see previous IPKat posts here). [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:11 pm
in contempt of court for willful violation of the automatic stay under section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code; (ii) ordering Riddell and its sales agents to cease immediately communications to Debtors’ current and prospective customers that are designed to harass Debtors, disparage Debtors’ products, misinform customers regarding the effect of Debtors’ chapter 11 proceedings, and/or coerce payment to Riddell of the judgment entered against… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am
In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court has held the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act to be constitutional (National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius, June 28, 2012, Roberts, J). [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
He went on to find that earlier pages in the sales process, including the full product details page, also targeted the UK, not least because that page stated “This item ships to the United Kingdom”. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am
Canada The Times Colonist reports that the Supreme Court of Canada has refused permission to appeal in the case of Nazerali v Mitchell in which the judge had awarded damages of $1,2 million (2016 BCSC 810) thus bringing to an end a 7 year legal battle. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:50 am
Yesterday, in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 12:45 pm
The Biden administration appealed the ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:33 am
Estee Lauder, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
