Search for: "Williams v. A" Results 4721 - 4740 of 19,696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2009, 7:22 am
Waldrip, Judge.Representing Appellants Mendoza and Cano: William L. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 4:15 am
Retirement System excludes expense allowance payments received pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement in determining the retirement allowanceMatter of Maillard v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 2008 NY Slip Op 10100, Decided on December 24, 2008, Appellate Division, Third Department Glenn Maillard, John Raptis and John Pidgeon retired from their respective administrative positions with the William Floyd Union Free School District [Albany County]. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 9:36 am
Even though I think it is high time we leave Elliot Spitzer alone, William Patry explains that some nude photos can be matter of public concern based on the First Circuit's decision in Nunez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:36 am
Reviewing the disqualification of an applicant pursuant to Civil Service Law §50.4Hirst v Agrelo, Supreme Court, New York County Part 50E, Index #403004/06, Decided March 16, 2007, Judge William A. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Retirement System excludes expense allowance payments received pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement in determining the retirement allowanceMatter of Maillard v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 57 AD3d 1299Glenn Maillard, John Raptis and John Pidgeon retired from their respective administrative positions with the William Floyd Union Free School District [Albany County].Maillard, a Tier II member of the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System [NYSTRS],… [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by Donald Barbati
As reported by the New Jersey Law Journal, the Appellate Division recently issued an opinion in the matter Westphal v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by Donald Barbati
As reported by the New Jersey Law Journal, the Appellate Division recently issued an opinion in the matter Westphal v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
In talc exposure litigation of ovarian cancer claims, plaintiffs were struggling to show that cosmetic talc use caused ovarian cancer, despite missteps by the defense.[1] And then lawsuit industrialist Mark Lanier entered the fray and offered a meretriciously beguiling move: Stop trying talc cases and start trying asbestos cases. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:21 am
See Ritchie at 52-53, 107 S.Ct. at 998-99; see also Raddatz at 679, 100 S.Ct. at 2414; Williams at 291; State v. [read post]