Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 13,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2007, 6:24 am
December 19, 2007).* Seraches of police officer's office telephone records was permitted under Smith v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 11:12 am
Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts, Juvenile & Family Courts, FAQS, http://www.tncourts.gov/courts/juvenile-family-courts/faqs. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
In the words of the court, citing Matter of Yonkers Firefighters v City of Yonkers, 165 AD3d 816, "The employment of a probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing and without a statement of reasons in the absence of a demonstration that the termination was [made] in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible or an illegal purpose, or in violation of statutory or decisional law. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
In the words of the court, citing Matter of Yonkers Firefighters v City of Yonkers, 165 AD3d 816, "The employment of a probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing and without a statement of reasons in the absence of a demonstration that the termination was [made] in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible or an illegal purpose, or in violation of statutory or decisional law. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
The statute provides an unsuccessful applicant with an administrative appeal process, and that decision can be challenged in court in a CPLR Article 78 proceeding. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:19 pm
From Sharper v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:51 pm
Moving on to the Court’s next opinion, in State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Marvel Enterprises, Inc. 13-720Issue: Whether this Court should overrule Brulotte v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
One such case was Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 7:40 am
City of Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:10 pm
LEXIS 58840 (ND GA, July 8, 2009), the court denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the matter.In Mayo v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 6:53 pm
Lorillard Inc. et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court decision from 1986, Goldman v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:11 am
Wolff v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 am
See, e.g., In re Search Warrant for Law Offices, 153 F.R.D. 55 (U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 4:41 am
His mother, as administrator of his estate, eventually brought suit in federal court for the alleged incident (federal court filing, NYSCEF Doc No. 273; Scott deposition tr, NYSCEF Doc No. 261 at 96) . [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:52 am
The full documentation is available from the District of Columbia District Court website under Gul v. [read post]
