Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 4741 - 4760 of 29,821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Segregate: Apportion Recoverable From Non-Recoverable on a Claim-by-Claim Basis and Perhaps on a Per-Defendant Basis; Account for Unsuccessful Claims. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
We tend to focus on the latter half, on defending or attacking the role of the commander as a convening authority, while neglecting to consider possible reforms in the range of offenses over which military courts have jurisdiction. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
In my last post,[1] I praised Lee Mickus’s recent policy paper on amending Rule 702 for its persuasive force on the need for an amendment, as well as a source for helping lawyers anticipate common judicial dodges to a faithful application of the rule.[2] There are multiple dodges used by judicial dodgers, and it behooves litigants to recognize and anticipate them. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:19 am by Joseph Koncelik
Previously, multiple environmental groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Conservation Law Foundation, and Defenders of Wildlife filed a separate challenge to the legality of the rule. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:30 am by Kevin
Slater, 888 F.3d 418 (9th Cir. 2018) (holding monkeys lack statutory standing to bring copyright claims). [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am by Schachtman
D.C. 46, 293 F. 1013 (1923). [3]  See “The Advocates’ Errors in Daubert” (Dec. 28, 2018). [4]  General Electric Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Extending the general jurisdiction at the domicile of the defendant by relying on a personal criterion different to the seat of the defendant enterprise is not a viable solution. a) Today US courts refuse to exercise jurisdiction based solely on the foreign enterprise ‘doing business’ within the territory. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
The Ninth Circuit ultimately concluded, in accord with the invited amici's arguments, that §1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) is unconstitutionally overbroad. 910 F. 3d 461, 485 (2018). [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:57 am by Jonathan F. Marshall
If you are charged with escape for leaving work release, eluding, or with any other crime, the diligent New Jersey criminal defense attorneys of The Law Offices of Jonathan F. [read post]