Search for: "Does 1 - 20" Results 4741 - 4760 of 28,806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2021, 6:23 am by Leiza Dolghih
”  See Department of Labor’s Resp. to the Emergency Pet. for a Writ of Mandamus at 33–34, In re AFL-CIO, No. 20-1158 (D.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:23 am by Leiza Dolghih
”  See Department of Labor’s Resp. to the Emergency Pet. for a Writ of Mandamus at 33–34, In re AFL-CIO, No. 20-1158 (D.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Read on for highlights from the report, which contains data about convictions under G.S. 20-179 from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:26 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
If a person is incapable with respect to treatment, section 20(5) indicates that a parent of the incapable person may make this decision, as long as it is not prohibited by a court order or separation agreement. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:43 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
., No. 20-CV-06686-VC, 2021 WL 822932, at *1 (N.D. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Pseudonymity can also cause difficulties in the fact-finding process, especially as the case gets closer to trial. [1.] [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the documentary evidence does not utterly refute the allegation that the termination of O'Riley's employment was not in compliance with law and lawful procedure and it does not show that she does not have a cause of action on this basis. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the documentary evidence does not utterly refute the allegation that the termination of O'Riley's employment was not in compliance with law and lawful procedure and it does not show that she does not have a cause of action on this basis. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 5:52 pm by Michael Lowe
To obtain a conviction, the AUSA does not need to provide evidence that the accused (or the child) crossed the Texas state line to or from another state or Mexico. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 10:08 am by Cassie J. Edgar
The fact that the inventors are the same or that there is common ownership does not prevent the earlier application from being counted as prior art.(1, 2) When considering how to best protect add-on enhancements to an existing patent application, be mindful that the benefit of preserving the original priority date for claims supported in the original disclosure may not be worth the risk of having the parent application count against you for prior art. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 8:40 am by John Jascob
But Coinbase does not want to shove a digital asset that is not fit for an S-1 disclosure, said Nallengara.Retail i [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Suppose we have Maryland 1 and Maryland 2, each with the same rules. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:10 pm by Kevin Kaufman
*—This estimate does not include about $145 billion in provisions scored by the Joint Committee on Taxation. [read post]