Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 4741 - 4760 of 21,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2013, 9:53 pm
A jury in Superior Court had found Toys R Us liable in the woman’s death, and awarded $2.6 million in compensatory damages to the deceased victim’s husband and daughter. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:33 pm by Stephen Bilkis
No. 2) by the attorneys for JEF for an order pursuant to CPLR §3212 granting Summary Judgment to the Defendant JEF and severing and dismissing the complaint and all cross-claims and counterclaims against said Defendant, on the ground that JEF is not individually liable for the torts or breach of contract, if any, of his co-Defendant F & F, P.C., of which Defendant JEF was at all relevant times president and sole shareholder is granted. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 6:52 am by David Klein
The Court granted Defendants Motion as it pertained to Plaintiffs’ ATDS claim, but denied the Motion as it pertained to Plaintiffs’ DNC claims. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:16 am by Jack Hoover
” Another six sub-factors govern the final “substantial assistance” element: (i) the nature of the act encouraged, (ii) the amount and nature of assistance given, (iii) the defendants absence or presence at the time of the tort, (iv) the defendants relation to the tortious actor, (v) the defendants state of mind, and (vi) duration of the assistance provided. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Defendants challenged the FTC’s survey, which was conducted by Dr. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:04 am by dhdlaw
  In those circumstances, it’s important to explore other defendants who have the resources necessary to cover your losses. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:45 am by Steve Statsinger
April 18, 2012) (Cabranes, Pooler, Wesley, CJJ)In this decision, the court found that the district court’s restitution order, which was based on the defendant's gain instead of the victims' loss, was error, but not plain error. [read post]
31 May 2015, 10:21 am by Law Lady
FRANKLIN DURAN, Respondent. 3rd District.Torts -- Malicious prosecution -- Attorney's fees -- Claim or defense not supported by material facts or applicable law -- Trial court erred in awarding attorney's fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes, in favor of defendant, an unlicensed contractor who had filed an invalid lien against plaintiff's property, on the basis that plaintiff's malicious prosecution action against… [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 3:46 am by Doug Wessel
The Supreme Court rejected the trial court's analysis that an employer cannot be vicariously liable when the employee is traveling to work at the time of the accident; instead, the Court focused on whether there was sufficient evidence of the employee's intent to benefit the employer at the time of the accident. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 3:46 am
The Supreme Court rejected the trial court's analysis that an employer cannot be vicariously liable when the employee is traveling to work at the time of the accident; instead, the Court focused on whether there was sufficient evidence of the employee's intent to benefit the employer at the time of the accident. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  They alleged that the defendants, including Epson, were liable for making false promotional “public statements” giving untrue reasons for the relatively high prices they were charging for their products. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 3:58 am by Ben
The defendants allegedly violated and continue to violate the plaintiff's exclusive rights in each of the copyrighted works. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:22 pm by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
The personal injury attorneys of Karsner & Meehan will gather any evidence in support of your claim and help you develop convincing arguments that the defendant caused your harm and should be liable for your damages. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:39 am by Bill Otis
Thompson, described below in the Heritage Foundation summary: In a 5-4 decision by Thomas, the Court held that a district attorney's office cannot be held liable under section 1983 for failure to train its prosecutors based on a single BRADY violation. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 9:19 am
Hendelson's death, the defendants issued new health warnings regarding the use of Duragesic. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:02 am by Dan Bressler
Obduskey alleged the defendants violated the the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act while carrying out foreclosure proceedings on his home. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 6:32 am by Bob Kraft
However, every type of law has a handful of complicated cases where it’s difficult or impossible to determine who is liable for the injury. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:30 am by John C. Manoog III
When a driver fails to act in a reasonably prudent manner, and someone else is hurt, the negligent driver can be held liable for the injured person’s medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:30 am by John C. Manoog III
When a driver fails to act in a reasonably prudent manner, and someone else is hurt, the negligent driver can be held liable for the injured person’s medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. [read post]