Search for: "MATTER OF P S" Results 4741 - 4760 of 18,880
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Is it just a matter of its there-ness for us?] [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:04 pm by Jon Brodkin
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced his Consumer Advisory Committee's new makeup on Wednesday. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 11:59 am by Sean Hayes
  The Korean court, under Korea’s Conflict of Laws Act, will look to the law of the nation of the vessel’s flag. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:23 pm by The Murray Law Firm
Should the facts of this matter reveal that the motel owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, Sean Bartnick’s family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for his wrongful death. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:43 am by Jan von Hein
The case demonstrates that the seemingly ‘neutral’ domain of Private International Law is not exempt from having to deal with delicate political matters such as the current global rise in anti-Israel and anti-Semitic sentiments. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Ryan, 806 P.2d 935, 941 (Colo. 1991) (upholding a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute, when limited to speech on matters of purely private concern). [3] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Ryan, 806 P.2d 935, 941 (Colo. 1991) (upholding a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute, when limited to speech on matters of purely private concern). [3] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Rick Pildes
  But that is a matter of luck, not inevitability. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 12:00 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The view that a negative jurisdictional decision is a final award and subject to appeal under Article 34 is apparently shared by Gary Born as expressed in International Commercial Arbitration (2nd ed., 2014, Vol. 1, p. 1104). [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:56 am by The Murray Law Firm
Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the victim’s family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:30 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
The trial court had reasoned that the lawsuit sought to enforce rights owned by the corporation and that allowing the plaintiff to collect directly from the defendant would prejudice the corporation’s creditors, reasoning as follows: Although this [c]ourt does have the discretion to treat [p]laintiff’s claim as a direct action since IFP was a closely held corporation, the fact that IFP has creditors who are still seeking recovery from IFP funds precludes… [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:11 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
I think these doctrines survive since they spring from the Florida Supreme Court; but how should the majority’s narrow interpretation of occupational causation be seen by a claimant, employer, claim’s adjuster, attorney, or JCC? [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Want guidance on responsibilities.Robert Schwartz Consumer Technology Association: Toleration, accommodation, and implied license matter a lot. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  [Of course all of that precedent came from P-favorable rulings that made it impossible to resolve these cases early.]Rose: 512 applies to broadband and platforms, and those have very different stakes. [read post]