Search for: "State v. L. B."
Results 4741 - 4760
of 6,570
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 11:13 am
L. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
§ 102(b). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
Such case law makes it clear that where the business assets in relation to which the opposition was filed have been transferred and at the same time the transferor has contractually agreed to transfer the opposition to the transferee, the status of opponent stays with the transferor until (a) evidence has been filed with the Office sufficiently evidencing the transfer and (b) a request has been filed to recognise the transfer of the status of opponent. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:31 pm
L. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:20 am
Salzburg, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am
The district court did not err in treating the Tygar-Yee article as § 102(b) prior art. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Amelio 141,167 127,500 765 4,884 274,316 Reuben V. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:01 am
(2) In a case of distance selling in which the buyer is established in a different Member State to that of the seller, does Article 5(5) of Directive [2001/29] require national law to be interpreted so broadly that a person owing the “fair compensation” referred to in Article 5(2)(b) of the directive who is acting on a commercial basis owes such compensation in at least one of the Member States involved in the distance selling? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Army Corps of EngineersDocket: 10-1059Issue(s): The court of appeals held in this case that land transfers by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to the State of South Dakota pursuant to the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 did not violate §§ 605(b)(3) and (c)(1)(B) of that Act because they did not include lands within the “external boundaries” of the Yankton Sioux Reservation. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
The '372 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Target Training Int'l v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
The '372 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Target Training Int'l v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm
N.J.S.A. 25:2-27(b); Putman v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
During fiscal year 2010, the highest paid executive was Mark V. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
Since the Wikipedia entry for James H. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm
L. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:47 pm
Ct. 1456, 556 U.S. __, 173 L. [read post]
