Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 4741 - 4760
of 16,405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2018, 3:46 am
Corp. v Nunez, 90 AD3d 568 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 6:10 am
In Scott v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 12:38 pm
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Second-degree child abuse This case arose out of an investigation by the Caroline County Department of Social Services into allegations that the victim, a minor, had been sexually abused by a family member. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 12:25 pm
Minor criminal matters (known as summary offenses) are handled in Magistrate Courts. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
(FamC (Jer) 22317-08-11 M.V. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
The nexus between state, CPC and United Front through the CPPCC, then, serves as the connective tissue between CPC and State constitutions, and between the political authority of the CPC and its exercise through the rule system, it itself has mandated as its own political line. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
Ganka v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
This episode is particularly topical given the S.V. case, focusing on the media’s portrayal of minorities. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 9:14 am
Warner Bros. fought back hard in Lyle v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:36 pm
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
Berry v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Here, Grutter v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm
A further discussion of this issue can be found in the matter of United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:21 am
The September 19, 2018 Court of Appeals opinion in Bojilov v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:44 am
The case, Namerow v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:50 am
For example, 27 CFR 4.35(a)(2)(v) defines “vinted”—when used in the name/address statement on the label—to mean that “the named winery, at the stated address, subjected the wine to cellar treatment in accordance with §4.22(c). [read post]
