Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 4741 - 4760
of 71,790
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2020, 7:12 am
Today the Supreme Court hears oral argument in California v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:03 am
Adler has a post titled “On the Eve of Argument in California v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) makes its third trip to the Supreme Court today under the caption California v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm
United States). [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:16 pm
In an amicus brief and SCOTUSBlog post, my co-blogger Josh Blackman and the Cato Institute's Ilya Shapiro claim that the individual plaintiffs in California v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 5:50 pm
Supreme Court] decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc v City of New York (2020)…. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] Millennium Rock Mortg., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:18 am
Moreover the prescribed form did not require the landlord’s name and address, stating at 6 as it did: “6. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am
California, however, cleverly quotes Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s very recent decision in Barr v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:30 am
It would also codify the outcome of Bostock v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 2:44 am
In fact, the Directive provides that Member States should take steps to facilitate the submission of such complaints. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:52 am
Court of Appeals in New York City affirmed the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Apple, finding that the IONEX mark was weak, the parties sold very different products to very different customers, and that there was no evidence of bad faith or of actual confusion in the (Saxon Glass Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
On Friday 13 November, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in R (on the application of Maughan) (AP) v Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 2:12 pm
This was with reference to the judgment of HHJ Luba QC in Pavey v LB Hackney. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm
A ‘bright line’ rule was permissible for social welfare measures, see, for example R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (Just for Kids Law intervening) (2015) UKSC 57, and would be even more so for a charity: These points apply a fortiori in relation to a proportionality assessment in respect of a measure taken by a charity, such as AIHA’s allocation policy. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 9:15 am
Chevron U.S.A, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 9:06 am
Supreme Court issued a series of rulings culminating in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 9:06 am
Chief Justice Rehnquist discussed these two heads of authority in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 11:01 pm
The Center for Biological Diversity argued that the CRA resolutions were unconstitutional, and failed to conform with INS v. [read post]
