Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 8,123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2014, 9:19 am
Vermont Transco LLC v. [read post]
Second Circuit Affirms Official Acts Immunity for Pakistani ISI Chiefs; Rejects Jus Cogens Exception
29 Aug 2014, 11:28 am
”) The Second Circuit panel rejected the plaintiffs’ arguments that courts are not required to defer to Executive branch SoIs and that there is, or should be, a jus cogens exception to official acts immunity, holding that it was bound by the Circuit’s prior decision in Matar v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:01 am
” (Ellsberg v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 3:22 pm
Lauren V. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:07 pm
Martin Zilber v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 10:36 am
See, eg, Rosenberg v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
That investigation is also far more complex in the United States than a look at the organization of its government might suggest. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:45 am
Broadly, the government highlights the practical difficulties associated with combating a non-state actor in the twenty-first century. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
They might, though serve as a basis for the formulation of public policy and national legislation by the OECD member states. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:10 am
In Borman v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
Contingent permanent appointments Cruz v New York State Unified Ct. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
(Baumancites and quotation marks omitted).The only exception to Bauman’s state of incorporation/principal place of business rule is for “exceptional” situations similar to Perkins v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:34 pm
Hamdan v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:58 pm
From today’s Dejoria v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
Over in the judicial branch, the United States Supreme Court is considering whether the PDA requires employers to provide accommodations to pregnant employees to the same extent they provide them to disabled workers in Young v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
Over in the judicial branch, the United States Supreme Court is considering whether the PDA requires employers to provide accommodations to pregnant employees to the same extent they provide them to disabled workers in Young v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:22 pm
Plaintiffs provided declarations from 34 current and former putative class members, all stating that they worked overtime hours and spent less than half of their workday engaged in sales-related activities outside their branch office. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:36 pm
In Rivera v. [read post]
