Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 4761 - 4780 of 15,464
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2018, 7:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The issue is whether the preemption clause of the uniform trade secrets act (here, the act was Louisiana's version) means that a plaintiff is barred from pursuing a civil law conversion claim for confidential information that fails to qualify as a trade secret.In Brand Services v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
  1-800 Contacts’ trademark terms have higher conversion rates than non-branded search terms. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:48 am
The dust has started to settle following the Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56 handed down recently (IPKat post here). [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:50 am by Brian M. Krause, Esq.
[v]So, this section defines prostitution broadly as performing various acts of sexual gratification (which are further defined in rather graphic and exhaustive detail under Section 11-.01 of the Code)[vi]in exchange for “anything of value. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:14 pm by Chuck Cosson
  [1]For example, in this interview with Jaron Lanier, the interviewer starts the conversation by asking Lanier for his thoughts on “what technology has done to our spiritual health”; https://www.wired.com/story/interview-with-jaron-lanier/. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
As the US Supreme Court recognized in Miranda v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 10:07 am by Phil Dixon
Conversely, a marijuana user, confronted with a positive drug screen, might claim they were only using lawful CBD products. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The engadget website has a post entitled “Google Maps keeps track of your conversations with local businesses”. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Earlier this Summer, I carried on about the decision from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Minarsky v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Oct. 30, 2018, Converse, Inc. v. [read post]