Search for: "Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit" Results 4761 - 4780 of 4,878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2022, 2:07 pm by Russell Knight
“The court may seek the advice of any professional, whether or not regularly employed by the court, to assist the court in determining the child’s best interests. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Co.,[1] the Fifth Circuit noted that: “A civil litigant’s right to retain counsel is rooted in fifth amendment notions of due process. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:15 am by Kevin
The district court denied the motion, and on July 9, the Seventh Circuit affirmed. [read post]
The U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to all Wisconsin employers) has explained that this broad and intentionally hands-off definition of religion protects courts from becoming embroiled in determining whether certain practices are orthodox in nature. [read post]
The U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to all Wisconsin employers) has explained that this broad and intentionally hands-off definition of religion protects courts from becoming embroiled in determining whether certain practices are orthodox in nature. [read post]
27 Aug 2006, 8:18 pm
  Over at her regular blog Denise reports that the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals) is podcasting its oral arguments. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Upon reviewing the factual record, however, the Court of Appeals held that the lower court’s finding was unsupported: “Dr. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am by Robert Liles
This has often made it difficult for patients with a long-established history of chronic pain to obtain relief.[2] In this article, we examine the standards applied by prosecutors and the courts when physicians and other qualified “practitioners” [3] are alleged to have illegally prescribed controlled substances. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:54 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit held that anthrax spores would be a “destructive substance” within the meaning of 18 U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
To take an extreme case, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals once upheld an obstruction-of-justice conviction against a lawyer representing an alleged racketeer because he filed too many motions and lawsuits and thereby disrupted an investigation of his client (U.S. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am by Bexis
  As readily acknowledged in SMW II, Hydrogen Peroxide clamped down hard on class certification, and required that plaintiffs seeking certification actually meet their burden of proof, even if there was an overlap with the “merits” of the case:The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently clarified the legal standard for class certification and explained the meaning of the “rigorous analysis” called for by Rule 23. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:54 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit 2006), a federal appellate court observed, “[w]hen a friend is false, blame the friend, not the government. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 8:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s holding, rejecting the insurer’s argument that the insureds were not acting within an insured capacity as D&Os and thus no wrongful act was alleged. 2019 U.S. [read post]