Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 6,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
United States Dist. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:30 pm
MARCH Ramos v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am
Wickham, 382 U.S. 111, 116 (1965); whether the rule is subject to a kind of reliance that would lend a special hardship to the consequences of overruling and add inequity to the cost of repudiation, e. g., United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. (09 Civ. 4515). [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court, January 21, 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:48 pm
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm
United States The Washington Post notes that Amazon is revolutionising its delivery system, allowing for delivery to individuals parked vehicles. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 11:02 pm
Anthony Kennedy described him in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 11:39 am
Chase Manufacturing, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
(Pix from Penn State Law Website.) [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
See SEC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:17 pm
Lucky 13 further claims that Swift had filed about sixty federal trademark applications with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:47 am
Dist. of California (9th Cir. 1983) (holding that "pretrial documents, such as those dealing with the question whether [the defendant] should be incarcerated prior to trial … are often important to a full understanding of the way in which the judicial process and the government as a whole are functioning"); United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
Excavating v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:18 pm
Relying on its August 2009 decision in CIT v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
