Search for: "Hill v. Hill"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 7,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Torrey Hills Community Coalition v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:24 pm
Actavis argued that Lilly's experts, Professors Hill and Sharp, made a fundamental error in that they had a mistaken believe that the Patent was an authoritative document in which statements made in it had to be supported by evidence. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The Court summarized the law on vested rights in New York as follows: " a vested right can be acquired when, pursuant to a legally issued permit, the landowner demonstrates a commitment to the purpose for which the permit was granted by effecting substantial changes and incurring substantial expenses to further the development" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d 41, 47; see Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d 542, 544; Matter of Lefrak Forest Hills Corp.… [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
In [*2]response, the plaintiff failed to present evidence establishing either that she commenced the action within the applicable three-year limitations period, or that the continuous representation toll applied in this case, since all of the documentary evidence in the record supports the conclusion that the legal representation had ended more than three years before this action was commenced, and there was no mutual understanding of a need for ongoing legal representation in the underlying matter… [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:04 am
Hill, 750 F.3d 982 (U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 3:59 am
– Rakusen v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:00 am
Hill, ___ N.C. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 10:19 am
Diaz v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 8:39 am
I believe Chase v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm
Kimberly McCauley is a California anti-vaccination activist, who has been in the news expressing her views. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
In Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am
Law §349 et ff. as per the Terms and Conditions) PLAINTIFF AND THE CLASSES v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
In Nielsen v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
In Jennings v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:05 am
The principal question in yesterday’s argument in SCA Hygiene Products v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:02 pm
Nowak v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
For Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons reviews two upcoming redistricting cases in the December sitting, Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
