Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 4761 - 4780 of 5,814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2010, 3:58 pm
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, an Article I court (from 1990 to 1995), and Louis J. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 11:25 am by admin
  Either way, it adds +1 apartment for a single person or childless couple (pre-children or post-children J ), with proximity and convenience. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
Section 273(b) of the Act refers to certain "method[s] of doing or conducting business& [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
B J 1 (estimating the rate of patent approvals by the PTO to be 97%).By the time the eBay brief had been filed, Quillen and Webster had back-pedaled from the 97% number, which was based on an assumption that a patent lawyer of ordinary skill would know was untrue. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am by INFORRM
Lord Lester’s Responsible Publication defence Under clause 1(1) of the Defamation Bill 2010, it is provided that any defendant has a defence where he shows that ‘(a) the words or matters complained of were published for the purposes of, or otherwise in connection with, the discussion of a matter of public interest; and (b) the defendant acted responsibly in making the publication. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:57 am by Lawrence Solum
: Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Matters ofIntellectual PropertyGeneral Reporter: Toshiyuki Kono, Fukuoka, JapanChair: Joost Blom, Vancouver, Canada(2) Constitutional Law (IV.B.) [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am by INFORRM
As Eady J put the matter in Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd: ‘Once the cat is out of the bag, and the intrusive publication has occurred, most people would think there was little to gain. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:47 am
Floyd J dismissed the claimants' action. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:07 pm by Ilya Somin
John Yoo disputes Epstein’s position: [J]ust because Yale doesn’t train practicing lawyers doesn’t mean that a) law schools in general are good at it, or b) that the bar exam has any real relationship to one’s success as a lawyer. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
In RST v UVW Tugendhat J identified the nature of the problem ([2009] EWHC 2448 (QB)[33]) At some point, the co [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 10:30 pm
A three-Judge bench of the Supreme Court has delivered its judgment (per Aftab Alam J.) in Daiichi Sankyo v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
In other words, the reimbursement of a fee requires there to be special provision (see for example decision J 33/86). [read post]