Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 7,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
It’s been said that the mark of an educated mind is being able to at once hold an idea and not necessarily agree. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
(David Post) The Op-Ed that Mark Lemley, Dave Levine, and I wrote about the egregious intellectual property bills now pending before Congress (SOPA, Protect-IP, and their ilk) was published today in the Stanford Law Review Online, and is available here for those who are interested (i.e., anyone who cares about the future of communication on the Internet). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
I expected to see the additional costs of SEC oversight of an SRO. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 1:59 am
As I argued with the pizza-as-vegetable debacle, Congress hijacked the USDA regulatory process to do the food industry's bidding. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:13 am
That would suggest these ratios are a free trade high water mark for the Democratic party. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
" Among the scholars cited there are Erwin Chemerinsky, Saul Cornell, Don Fehrenbacher, Robert George, Mark Graber, Daniel Hamilton, Morton Horwitz, Daniel Hulsebosch, Frank Michelman, Chris Tomlins, Mark Tushnet, Robin West, and Gordon Wood. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
” (citations and internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 5:48 am
For 2011 only (unless Congress extends it and, er, I wouldn’t count on it), an IRA owner who has reached the age of 70½ or older can make a direct transfer of up to $100,000 per year to an eligible charity, tax free. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:10 pm
(Roger Clemens, for whom I have no warmth in my heart, will be tried this summer on allegedly lying to Congress; I take the same position on Clemens as I do on Bonds.) [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:44 am
While it wasn’t the final collision or the ultimate rejection (by definition), yesterday’s House Judiciary Committee “mark up” hearing on the Stop Online Piracy Act had attributes of both. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Mark D. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:45 am
Back in February of this year, I passed the decade mark since I launched my maiden site, RealCorporateLawyer.com (here's how that site looked when I first launched). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:09 pm
Bush to justify an invasion of Iraq, we are marking the end of a massively costly endeavor that should have never happened in the first place. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
I wasn't able to follow it in real time, but I've peaked at the written testimony submitted by one of the witnesses, Mark Hiraide, a California lawyer. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:46 pm
Now that, I would say, is actual electoral power. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:09 am
Congressman Bucshon’s recitation of his experience as a surgeon was completely off the mark. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:57 am
On one view, the amendment is dismantling the high water mark for consumer privacy protection. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:57 pm
(ex: Frank Pasquale, Mark Rottenberg, GoogleWatch.) [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 5:52 am
When Congress afforded retroactive to the telecoms for warrantless wiretapping, it should have at least acknowledged the cost of its actions, both to individuals and to the rule of law as a whole. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 5:51 am
However, as I noted about 2 weeks before OWS started, I have my doubts. [read post]
