Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 40,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
The Wang II decision follows a remand from the United States Supreme Court which had reversed the original Wang judgment in light of the inconsistencies between the lower courts' rulings and the certification standards the Supreme Court announced in Dukes v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Thrift Auto Repair, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
It is Lance v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:02 am
By Eric Goldman In the 1992 case Quill v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am
As the first week of the March argument session winds down, Susan Morse has this blog’s opinion analysis in Marinello v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:57 pm
Burns v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:06 pm
Finding parallels in the City of Camas' 30 percent open space set-aside for residential subdivision development struck down by the Washington State Supreme Court in Isla Verde Int'l Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 7:51 am
In State of Hawaii v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 1:28 pm
He called Oracle v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:00 am
It’s important to note that in Murphy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:01 am
Even in light of last week’s decision in US v. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 3:51 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 1:23 pm
Pets should also be washed down prior to leaving the beach . . . [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
Schuette v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:24 pm
The state had its chance. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:25 pm
He simply sat down and waited. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 2:35 am
In these cases, the Court stated, the claimant have to ground their standing to sue for all and any content over which they claim infringement. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:12 am
Gerson, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down two major, and quickly decided, rulings on January 13, 2022. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:07 am
The court’s reasoning The CJEU has previously held that penalties laid down in rules of the common agricultural policy, such as the temporary exclusion of an economic operator from the benefit of an aid scheme, are not of a criminal nature (see Case 137/85 Maizena and Others [1987] ECR 4587, paragraph 13; Case C-240/90 Germany v Commission [1992] ECR I-5383, paragraph 25; and Case C-210/00 Käserei Champignon Hofmeister [2002] ECR… [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
On 1 April 2015, Nicola Davies J will hand down judgment in Lachaux v AOL Ltd.. [read post]
