Search for: "State v. Heard" Results 4761 - 4780 of 17,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
   On 27 February 2020, Warby J heard the PTR in the case of Aven v Orbis. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Bryan Heaney
However the Scottish appeal in the case of Doogan v Greater Glasgow Health Board, which is being heard today, raises the controversial issue of the scope of section 4 of the Abortion Act 1967 (the “Act”). [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 26/1/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard… [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 5:33 pm by INFORRM
In the interview, the applicant stated, among other things, that she had heard that the deceased child had fallen out of a train without a teacher present. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June… [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:22 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Justices thus looked in two clearly opposite directions as they heard more than 75 minutes of argument in American Electric Power, et al., v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court heard argument in Nielsen v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]