Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 11,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2016, 4:30 am
As of late October Trump campaign had been badly outspent by Clinton, with Super PAC money favoring her by more than 3-1 [Bloomberg] Clinton v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:36 am
Dental, the main question was whether the Board was “actively supervised” by the state. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 10:42 am
Callaghan, September 22, 2016, Court of Appeal -Fourth Appellate District – State of California More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 5:39 am
” See also Cox v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 5:00 am
Ultimately Supreme Court directed that State Farm Insurance Company [State Farm], with which the Birnbaums had automobile and umbrella insurance policies, be joined.The Appellate Division said that the County, in support of motion, had submitted the consultant agreement. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:34 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:54 am
That is the question before the justices on Wednesday morning, in Lynch v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:47 pm
Khan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 8:05 am
Five states – Arizona, California, Maine, Massachusetts, and Nevada – all have marijuana legalization initiatives on the ballot. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:00 am
SCOTUSblog reports that the United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Packingham v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:00 am
SCOTUSblog reports that the United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:30 am
Youn stated she was always enamored with both subjects. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
The citation is R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
The main focus was put on the R (Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2015] EWCA Civ 1311 case, which considered issues of procedural fairness in the context of Commission Regulation EC No 658/2007 concerning financial penalties for infringement of certain obligations in connection with marketing authorisations.3. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm
In the recent case (DeWolfe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:15 am
Facts: This case (Wyman v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 1:30 pm
The Court of Appeal further reiterated how the “prevailing party” is the party who, on a practical level, achieved its main litigation goals (Heather Farms HOA v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:23 am
In fact, as stated by the referring court, it is that particular third party which the defendant in the main proceedings intends to approach in order to collect the necessary additional data. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:22 pm
Alaska Oil and Gas Ass’n v. [read post]
