Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 8,447
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2013, 4:58 pm
” United States and The Vulcan Society, Inc., et al v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:02 am
Practice Tip: Patent decisions of the Federal Circuit, a federal appellate court, are unique in that they are binding precedent throughout the United States. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:35 am
Related posts:Alien Tort Statute American Society of International Law Call for Proposals New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:00 am
(filed 04/08/13) Amici Curiae Brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:59 am
U.S., et al., C.A. [read post]
14 May 2013, 6:56 am
Bard, Inc., et al., Civ. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:58 am
Ranbaxy Laboratories, Ltd., et al. , Case No. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:38 am
National Labor Relations Board, et al. [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:00 am
The Internal Revenue Code is included in the United States Code at Title 26. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
Cook-Deegan et al., Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for inherited susceptibility to cancer: Comparing breast and ovarian cancers with colon cancers, GENET. [read post]
7 May 2013, 11:41 pm
The motion by Google et al. already indicated that Apple had declared its intent to oppose it. [read post]
7 May 2013, 12:26 am
Voetsch, Andrew, et al., “FoodNet Estimate of the Burden of Illness Caused By Non-Typhoidal Salmonella Infections in the United States,” CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, Vol. 15, No. 38, Supplement 3, pp. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
Sanders argues that the Milward opinion is important because it highlights what he characterizes as a “rhetorical conflict that has been ongoing, often below the surface, since the United States Supreme Court’s 1993 opinion in Daubert v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:40 am
Hector Luque et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:45 pm
Signal International, LLC, et al. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:45 pm
Signal International, LLC, et al. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:23 am
Kurtz: Did they say why, Willard, why they want to terminate my command? [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:29 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The alleged altering and commercial exploitation of a nine-year-old photo of a then-teen with Down Syndrome that went viral on the Internet prompted the 26-year-old man and his parents last week to file an $18 million suit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, according to reports by the Associated Press and the NashvilleCityPaper.com Web site.Holland et al. v. [read post]
