Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 21,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
In the Illinois Supreme Court decision in Peach, the Court ruled that the question of whether the photographs were admissible depended on whether they were relevant, and that relevancy is tested in light of logic, experience, and accepted assumptions about human behavior. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 6:23 pm
See, “We tested popular cellphone for radio frequency radiation. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 7:28 am
Those tests have since spurred Congressional oversight committees to call for standardized testing methods and terminology to dispel ambiguity about how results are interpreted and ensure the public at large is protected from products containing deadly asbestos. [read post]
Court dismisses some of trucking association’s challenges to California AB 5, but injunction remains
14 Feb 2020, 8:07 am
The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claim that AB 5’s ABC test violates the dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:17 am
The embrace of bad studies and invalid inferences is not the exclusive province of the plaintiffs’ bar. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:05 pm
He recommended adopting a proportionality test to evaluate whether protecting minors from conversion therapy outweighs First Amendment concerns, given its flexibility to balance both parties’ interests. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:05 pm
He recommended adopting a proportionality test to evaluate whether protecting minors from conversion therapy outweighs First Amendment concerns, given its flexibility to balance both parties’ interests. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:51 am
ABC test codified. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
In this matter, the issue appeared to center around whether the Plaintiff was a licensee or a trespasser.Finding that the Plaintiff had alleged sufficient facts to get beyond a demurrer, the court denied the Defendant’s Preliminary Objections in this regard.The court also denied the Preliminary Objections filed by the Defendant against the Plaintiff’s general allegations of reckless and willful conduct.Judge Nealon once again ruled, as he has done on numerous… [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
During that first day of work, the Plaintiff was operating a standup forklift when he collided with a parked forklift and allegedly sustained injuries as a result.The Plaintiff sued FedEx following this incident.FedEx eventually filed a Motion for Summary Judgment requesting the dismissal of the Plaintiff’s claims for negligence on the basis that FedEx was Solomon’s statutory employer and was therefore immune from suit under the Pennsylvania Workers’… [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm
Attorneys for the plaintiffs are Michel & Associates, the leading California firm on firearms law. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 1:00 pm
Plaintiffs claim damages in excess of $5 million. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:21 am
Plaintiff filed this HCLA suit alleging that defendant breached the standard of care by failing to perform certain imaging tests, and that “but for the Defendants’ acts and omissions, she would have full use of and sensation in her left hand[.] [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:30 am
Applying the same pair of tests, EXIT USA was a closer call, but defendants were still not able to overcome the presumption of validity. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy noted for the majority that the United States had refused to give the plaintiff her tax refund without a decision of the court, and it seemed likely that, if the court did not reach the merits, it might never find a case in which to rule on the Defense of Marriage Act, which affected more than 1,100 laws, including those governing Congress and the judiciary. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:18 am
However, one change in particular will have a significant impact on plaintiffs: the establishment of a higher standard to obtain certification. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
Moreover, the test for the tort of false light somewhat resembles the test for defamation. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:24 am
” As to delay, “while this conduct had been ongoing for some time, the Plaintiffs moved promptly once they could confirm the misconduct by testing Defendants’ products. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:06 pm
In opposition, the plaintiffs produced an expert affirmation that raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant hospital deviated from the standard of care, by stating that the minor plaintiff displayed symptoms that warranted further testing to determine if she had viral encephalitis. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:59 am
[Not loving that.]Eric Goldman: So you want judges to order compulsory licensing—does that just apply to the plaintiffs, or is it the universe of potential plaintiffs? [read post]
