Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK" Results 4761 - 4780 of 7,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2011, 9:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Notably, the exam- iner never raised the question whether Singh was § 102(a) prior art, never addressed that argument, never ex- pressed any concerns as to any alleged deficiencies with the Declaration, and never issued a rejection using Singh as § 102(a) prior art.In this case, the CAFC noted:In a series of opinions, both this court and our predecessor court, the United States Court of Customs & Patent Appeals (“Patent Court”), have… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The United States Patent and Trademark Office and European Patent Office declined to recognize the autonomous AI system DABUS as an inventor despite its two inventions. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wood, Herron , on the subject on legal malpractice cases in the patent area [PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC denied ], Judge O’MALLEY authored a lengthy dissent, arguing against federal jurisdiction.From the dissent, giving background on the case:The gist of Byrne’s malpractice case is that defendants negligently failed to secure broader patent protection for his invention from the United States Patent and Trademark Office… [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:52 pm by Nikki Siesel
The United States Patent & Trademark Office will refuse a trademark on the Principal Register if the primary significance of the mark as a whole is a surname. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:35 pm by LTA-Editor
  The defendants asserted that the claims in the patents were not novel and that other parties had demonstrated and disclosed the underlying invention before the patent applications were on file at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:55 pm by ipdeals
  With the way the law of inequitable conduct is going in the United States, “DIY patent examination” is almost certainly out of the question in the minds of most practicing biotech and pharma patent attorneys, so expect claim sets to get narrower. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:30 am
Finally, as data is abundant, confidential and complex, parties should be advised to explicitly exclude US-style discovery whenever the seat of arbitration is in the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
  The changes further made the novelty defeating acts available wherever they occur in the world, thereby removing requirements related to occurrences in the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 10:01 pm
     Of particular interest is Section 318 of the Act, entitled "Patent Study," which calls for the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office, in consultation with representatives of interested parties in the private sector, to conduct a study to determine the extent to which changes to the United States patent system are necessary to increase the flow of climate change-related… [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 10:01 pm
     Of particular interest is Section 318 of the Act, entitled "Patent Study," which calls for the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office, in consultation with representatives of interested parties in the private sector, to conduct a study to determine the extent to which changes to the United States patent system are necessary to increase the flow of climate change-related… [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 7:50 pm
According to Ranbaxy's cert petition:This case presents an important federal question: In seeking a patent term extension under 35 U.S.C. 156 on the basis that the patent claims an approved drug, do the controlling statute and regulation require a pharmaceutical company to disclose (1) its own prior, inconsistent representations made before the United States Patent and Trademark Office that the patent does not cover the approved… [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 7:22 am by Fred Rocafort
Creative—if not always classy—minds are not taking a break during the COVID-19 emergency, as evidenced by the flurry of coronavirus-related trademark applications filed in the last few weeks at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:08 am by Michael Geist
Appeared in the Toronto Star on How Canada Caved During Pacific Trade Deal Talks in Hawaii Late last month, Canada joined eleven other countries including the United States, Japan, and Australia in Hawaii for what many experts expected would be the final round of negotiations on the Trans Pacific Partnership. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by The Docket Navigator
Basic information about a patent, such as the filing, issue and priority dates associated with a particular U.S. patent number are available at, for example, the website of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, (“USPTO”). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:32 pm by James Yang
You can certainly copy your original patent application, modify or tack onto the back end of the original application any new features for refilling with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
29 May 2015, 8:04 am by Gene Quinn
Patent and Trademark Office in the field of drone technologies. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 5:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
from a post on 21 May 2010-->In yet another attempt to expedite important patent applications through the examination process the United States Patent and Trademark Office announced earlier today that it is revising its Green Technology Pilot Program. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:51 am
Perhaps we can find the answer in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP): 1202.03(f)(i) Slogans or Words Used on the GoodsSlogans or phrases used on items such as t-shirts andsweatshirts, jewelry, and ceramic plates have been refused registration as ornamentation that purchasers will perceive as conveying a message rather than indicating source of the goods. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 8:03 am
  This particular letter I received was one of those that begged to be investigated...The 65 Year Old Integrated Radio Patent StrategyYesterday I wrote about how the growing backlog of applications at the United States Patent and Trademark Office has caused the average time a patent application remains pending to rise to ridiculous levels. [read post]