Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 51,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2016, 3:18 pm
Compucredit Corp. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:07 pm
The surprise question of the night was what the candidates would say about the idea of a Cuban Consulate in Coral Gables, given the US has now normalized relations with Cuba. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Feliz v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
As Justice Ginsburg explained for the Court in Vartelas v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 7:51 am
Gent v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
In a disappointing decision in the case of R v Vice Media Canada Inc (2016 ONSC 1961) an Ontario court has upheld a production order requiring Vice Media Canada Inc. [read post]
9 May 2018, 2:58 pm
In WesternGeco v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:43 am
Back in the day, the syllabus used to state the law of the case. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:07 pm
The fate of business method patents may be decided very soon since the US Supreme Court has decided to take on Bilski v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
"Absent contrary EPA guidance to which we might defer, the more tenable reading of RCRA is the one we have given it: PCP-based wood preservative that is released into the environment as a natural, expected consequence of its intended use -- as a preservative for wooden utility poles -- is not automatically 'solid waste' under RCRA's definition of that term." [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am
In NML Capital v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
,ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:54 am
Our readers have given us wide-ranging feedback since the launch of our annual EEOC litigation study, EEOC-Initiated Litigation: Case Law Developments In 2013 And Trends To Watch For In 2014. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
In Guzzo v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 8:39 am
Google v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:07 pm
Central 25, LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 5:17 pm
In Perkins v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm
The Mail on Sunday has described the judgment as an “alarming restriction on press freedom follow[ing] a series of cases in which rich, famous and powerful figures have used privacy arguments to avoid stories from harming their reputations” and, given the importance of the issues decided in the case, it is likely to be appealed. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:31 am
Lord Reed noted that this was contrary to the principle under UK administrative law that a statutory power must be exercised by the person on whom the power has been conferred (R v Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison ex parte Hague [1990] UKHL 8 and Leech v Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison [1988] UKHL 16 cited). [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
It is based on their recent paper, “Contractual Remedies in Mergers: Lessons from Crispo v. [read post]
