Search for: ""duty to warn""
Results 461 - 480
of 1,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2016, 8:31 am
Laurie Sherwood of Walsworth WFMB, LLP noted some issues Disney may face, including Disney’s duty to warn guests about the alligators, Disney’s previous knowledge and the subsequent steps it took, as well as the probability that such an event would occur. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 2:04 pm
Resorts like Disney have a duty to warn of hidden dangers lurking on its property. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 11:34 am
” Defendant moved for summary judgment, claiming they “had no duty to warn [plaintiff] of the three-and-on-half-inch step-down at the doorway because it was not foreseeable that anyone would fall because of it. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 11:34 am
” Defendant moved for summary judgment, claiming they “had no duty to warn [plaintiff] of the three-and-on-half-inch step-down at the doorway because it was not foreseeable that anyone would fall because of it. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 5:20 am
Under Illinois law, a product must adequately warn of dangers, but when a danger is obvious, there is no duty to warn. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 3:26 am
The duty to warn allegedly imposed by California law would not require Internet Brands to remove any user content or otherwise affect how it publishes or monitors such content. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 8:10 am
“Moreover, there is no duty to warn when a danger is as well known to the plaintiff as it is to the defendant, but if a certain danger is peculiarly foreseeable to the defendant but not the plaintiff, there is a duty to warn. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 8:10 am
“Moreover, there is no duty to warn when a danger is as well known to the plaintiff as it is to the defendant, but if a certain danger is peculiarly foreseeable to the defendant but not the plaintiff, there is a duty to warn. [read post]
31 May 2016, 12:28 pm
Using a pseudo-textualist approach, the panel says Doe’s failure-to-warn claim does not treat ModelMayhem as the “publisher or speaker” of third party content because: The duty to warn allegedly imposed by California law would not require Internet Brands to remove any user content or otherwise affect how it publishes or monitors such content. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:38 am
“Every person has a right to presume that every other perform his duty and obey the law. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:42 am
She sued for premises liability, alleging the defendants had violated their duty to warn her of a dangerous situation on their property — specifically, black ice. [read post]
5 May 2016, 4:41 pm
A property’s owner may be discharged of the duty to warn when the hazard is open and obvious. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Dandridge, now deceased, brought a claim against Crane for negligence, negligent failure to warn, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, strict tort liability, fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of post-sale duty to warn, wrongful death and loss of consortium. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:32 am
As such, Publix had no duty to warn the plaintiff about the dangers the spilled detergent presented. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 11:22 am
The presence of a learned intermediary cuts off plaintiffs’ ability to prove reliance and causation – there is no duty to warn the patient directly. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:00 pm
Finally, the court held that the defendant had no duty to warn the decedent’s physicians about the non-prescription Motrin the decedent ingested. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
” In its decision, the court also applied the pre-Tincher rule that there is no duty to warn of risk that only arises when existing warnings are ignored. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:48 am
And that therefore, defendant had a duty to warn of the risks of birth defects from Clomid taken prior to pregnancy. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 4:12 pm
In May, the court explained that due to the intersections between strict liability and negligent failure to warn claims, a manufacturer has a duty to warn in strict liability in the same circumstances as in negligence. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:04 pm
Thus, the defendant had a duty to strengthen the drug’s warnings in 2001, and if it had done so, it would have prevented their injuries, which were diagnosed in 2012. [read post]
