Search for: "ACE LTD" Results 461 - 480 of 768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2011, 6:20 am by J
The White Book, Woodfall and one county court case (Hillbrow (Richmond) Ltd v Alogaily 2005) say that a default judgment isn't good enough. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The nature of the bar The House of Lords in Derbyshire CC v Times Newspapers Ltd ([1993] AC 534), decided that a local authority should not be able to sue in defamation. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 3:51 am by INFORRM
Guardian Newspapers Ltd v IC EA/2010/0070. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
K&J had argued that a by the way statement made by Lord Templeman in Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 1) [1992] 1 AC 494 to the effect that "I consider that the practice of ordering indemnity costs as a condition of granting relief is ripe for reconsideration" should be followed in preference to Chadwick LJ's statement of principle in Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1088 at paragraph 14: "Third, the object of the court… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
K&J had argued that a by the way statement made by Lord Templeman in Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 1) [1992] 1 AC 494 to the effect that "I consider that the practice of ordering indemnity costs as a condition of granting relief is ripe for reconsideration" should be followed in preference to Chadwick LJ's statement of principle in Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1088 at paragraph 14: "Third, the object of the court… [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Among the examples to come before the courts in recent years have been repeated offensive publications in a newspaper (as in Thomas); victimisation in the workplace (Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust[2007] 1 AC 224 ); and campaigns against the employees of an arms manufacturer by political protesters:EDO Technology Ltd v Campaign to Smash EDO[2005] EWHC 2490 (QB). [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm by Howard Knopf
On November 26, 2015 the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) issued what may prove to be its most important copyright ruling to date in terms of its effect on tariffs, the tariff making process, the Copyright Board and the copyright bar. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:42 am by Florence Campbell Jones
March 2020 Several airlines have announced their intention to ground their operations in light of Covid-19 and lockdowns announced by a number of countries. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm by The Legal Blog
Raveendran Supreme Court of India The Supreme Court in Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Other cases, including Gros v Crook ((1969) 113 SJ 408) and Citizens Life Assurance Co Ltd v Brown ([1904] AC 423) appeared to support that approach. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:01 am by Saloni Khanderia
Ltd. v Diaconicolas & Capsopolus, the court stated that regardless of how ‘novel, original or striking’ the colour scheme may be, it was not a feature that was relied upon by the ordinary purchaser to identify the source of the product. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:55 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
  [1] AIB Group (UK) Plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2012] EWHC 35 (Ch), per HHJ Cooke at paragraph 24 [2] Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] AC 412 [3] AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2013] EWCA Civ 45, per LJ Patten at paragraph 47 [4] AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2014] UKSC 58, per Lord Toulson at paragraph 64 [5] ibid., per Lord Reed at paragraph 137 [6] Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton and Co (1 [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:32 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
” Citing Lord Reid in Burmah Oil Co (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate [1965] AC 75, the Court determined: “The prerogative is really a relic of a past age, not lost by disuse, but only available for a case not covered by statute. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:23 am by Florian Mueller
Given this blog's frequent reporting and commentary on automotive patent licensing, I wanted to share some thoughts and observations on that pool.MPEG LA's website explains that this pool relates to "technologies underlying worldwide standards for conductive AC and DC charging, connection, communication and safety used in equipment that provides electric charging in and to electric vehicles. [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:06 am by Sai Vinod
Whether it’s Galaxy Ace or iPhone, Motorola cannot discriminate between Samsung or Apple. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
| IP: When innovation is the answer to a spiritual funk Never Too Late 63 [week ending on Sunday 13 September] - Fair compensation in reprography and private copying: the ECS’ version | Substitute sellers | Teva UK Ltd & Another v Leo Pharma | Evidence-based IP policy | KitKat case | UK IPO’s priorities | UK IPO’s… [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
The law has been recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Limited [2015] UKSC 10; [2015] AC 1229, which I sought to summarise in Vertical Leisure Limited v Poleplus Limited [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC). [read post]