Search for: "APPLICATION OF SMITH" Results 461 - 480 of 7,573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2011, 12:25 pm by Hull and Hull LLP
 The application was eventually dismissed and the reasons provided by… David Smith: I think it was Justice Pattillo right? [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:47 am by Stephen Jenei
The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) dictates that at least three satellite offices be opened by the USPTO in three years. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 6:00 am by Lisa Baird
Applications for CLE credit will be filed in Delaware, Florida, Ohio, and Virginia. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:05 pm
I appreciate Randy’s consistent application of his “unprecedented” principle of constitutional interpretation from the Obamacare case. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:40 am
  The US Trustee has also filed motions for reconsideration when the Court has entered these orders.Judge Massey recently entered an Order clarifying the Rule, in In re Smith, Ch. 11 Case No. 08-63990 (click here for Order). [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 10:23 pm by Patricia Salkin
  For the aforementioned reasons, the court found the Commission did not exceed its jurisdiction or act illegally in its consideration of the Green Hill application, and the approval of the application was supported by material evidence. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:50 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Today, Andrew Boortz of Reed Smith provides some insight on the site, which highlights whenever anyone uses a location-based web application to 'check in' someplace, therefore letting everyone know that they are no longer at home. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:40 pm
That's the provocative claim, at least, that Steven Smith (USanDiego) makes in his new essay on SSRN, That Old-Time Originalism. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:03 am by Dan Bressler
“Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Finds Conflict of Interest for Class Counsel Also Representing Individual” — “In Smith v Lafarge Canada Inc, 2022 ABQB 289 [Smith], the Court of Queen’s Bench considered a preliminary application arising out of a proposed class action which involved claims advanced on behalf of the proposed class as well as individual claims specific to the proposed representative plaintiff. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
A Masters of Laws student at the University of Calgary has written an article about the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Smith v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:29 am
  The court opined that Smith's proposed rule would "have the effect of encouraging applicants to dress up an application for leave by adding non-existent conditions. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 3:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
Lamar Smith pushed for a voice vote today for H.R. 6621. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:20 am
If you have any questions about the Committee or application process, please do not hesitate to contact the Committee Secretary, Erin Smith, at (510) 858-7358 or esmith@fvaplaw.org, or the Committee Chair, Karli Eisenberg, at (916) 210-7913 or Karli.Eisenberg@doj.ca.gov. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
The third-party applications had no probative value for determining actual third-party use. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:35 pm by Jake Ward
§102 (Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, commonly known as the “AIA”) (a) Novelty; Prior Art. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:10 am by D. Kappos
Improving patent quality was also one of the stated goals of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act patent reform legislation signed into law by President Obama in 2011. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:02 pm by K&L Gates
§ 22B-1, deals with indemnity agreements and therefore was not applicable to this case. [read post]