Search for: "Apotex"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2012, 8:41 pm
Apotex’s efforts to circumvent the injunction against it were not yet over. [read post]
25 May 2012, 11:32 am
Apotex Corp., 669 F.3d 1370 (Fed. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:37 pm
Apotex, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:54 am
Apotex. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:46 am
Apotex Inc., et. al., 2-07-cv-04417 (NJD May 7, 2012, Order) (Chesler, J.) [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:52 am
Les Laboratoires Servier and another v Apotex Inc and others [2012] EWCA Civ 593; [2012] WLR (D) 138 “The court was able to take into account a wide range of considerations in order to ensure that the ex turpi causa defence only applied where it was a just and proportionate response to the illegality in question. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm
Apotex Corp., 403 F.3d 1331, 1343-44 (Fed. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:14 am
In the Otsuka Pharmaceutical case at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Judge Lourie concluded For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:00 pm
Apotex sought damages on the undertaking for the loss of UK sales. [read post]
6 May 2012, 8:43 pm
Apotex, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:57 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Les Laboratoires Servier & Anor v Apotex Inc & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 593 (03 May 2012) Sullivan v Bristol Film Studios Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 570 (03 May 2012) Medeva BV v Comptroller General of Patents [2012] EWCA Civ 523 (03 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) OB v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Rev 1) [2012] EWCA Crim 901 (02 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Calver, R (on the application of) v The Adjudication Panel for… [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 9:35 pm
Apotex and Bayer v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:46 pm
Lilly alleges that Apotex seeks approval for ANDA and that the product infringes its patents. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:36 am
Apotex Corp., 316 F.3d 1348 (Fed. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Hospira Inc. and Apotex Inc. and shares how the CAFC found that the patents were invalid over withheld references, and unenforceable for inequitable conduct. 2) IP Watchdog: Beware Twitter's New Patent Agreement Scheme - This post highlights and critiques Twitter's announcement that later this year it will implement what they are calling the "Innovators Patent Agreement," which they claim will ensure that patents are only used for defensive purposes. 3) Patently-O:… [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Hospira Inc. and Apotex Inc. and shares how the CAFC found that the patents were invalid over withheld references, and unenforceable for inequitable conduct. 2) IP Watchdog: Beware Twitter's New Patent Agreement Scheme - This post highlights and critiques Twitter's announcement that later this year it will implement what they are calling the "Innovators Patent Agreement," which they claim will ensure that patents are only used for defensive purposes. 3) Patently-O:… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:28 pm
Apotex Corp., 316 F.3d 1348 (Fed. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:49 pm
Apotex, Inc., 540 F.3d 1353 (Fed. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 1:21 pm
5,750,561 owner Aventis sued Hospira and Apotex for infringing the cancer drug concoction. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
Apotex Corp., 439 F.3d 1312, 1320 (Fed. [read post]
