Search for: "BROWN v. NORTH CAROLINA" Results 461 - 480 of 581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2025, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
This practice of "red-lining" led to segregated neighborhoods which, even post-Brown v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 11:11 am by John Floyd
North Carolina (1976): A state may not automatically impose the death sentence on any offender, including murderers, because the penalty of death is “qualitatively different from a sentence of imprisonment. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:31 am by SHG
As Jesse notes, North Carolina Supreme Court Chief Justice Cheri Beasley, who is black, female, and, if identitarian assumptions are correct, should have been the mother lode of racial and gender empathy, has spoken out for the cause. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am by Alfred Brophy
Perhaps the best-known application of this thesis involves the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Branker, No. 07-8 Denial of habeas petition challenging convictions for the murder of a state trooper and a deputy sheriff is affirmed where: 1) the Supreme Court of North Carolina did not unreasonably apply the clearly established federal law of Batson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Ayo Aladesanmi
Regan delivered the announcement at the site of a historic toxic dump protest in Warren County, North Carolina alongside civil rights leaders and environmental justice advocates. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
THE INCOMPETENT ADMINISTRATION OFLETHAL INJECTION PROCEDURES HASRESULTED IN FORESEEABLE ANDPREVENTABLE PROBLEMS IN NUMEROUSEXECUTIONS.......................................................29CONCLUSION..........................................................36TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page(s) Brown v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:14 am by SHG
As the standard example goes, the monumental decision in Brown v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Sotomayor, dissented from the denial of review in Harness v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 4:00 pm by James Romoser
In cases involving the University of North Carolina and Harvard, they argue that the 14th Amendment (which applies to public universities) and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act (which applies to private universities that take federal funding) bar affirmative action altogether. [read post]