Search for: "BUFFALO v. BUFFALO"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2020, 7:04 am
(Sovereign Immunity)Elliot v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
David Forte (Cleveland-Marshall Law) presents “Brown v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 1:00 pm
Texas heard CSIRO v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:36 am
In 2007, however, Judge Cacheris reversed the view he expressed in Phoenix Renovation Corp. and recognized the “independent personal stake” exception in Buffalo Wings Factory, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 12:40 am
Exhaustion of administrative remediesFormica v Huntington, App. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:12 pm
In Matter of the Town of Oyster Bay v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:12 pm
In Matter of the Town of Oyster Bay v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:34 am
Buffalo Run Casino (Okla. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
William Rehnquist clerked for Jackson at the time Brown v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
In a previous blog post, we wrote about the recent Rahman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
The computer said to be used was located in a residence on Parkridge Avenue in Buffalo, owned by appellant's motherAppellant's Brief in People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 4:31 am
Webb of Buffalo, Bausenwein v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
Barnhard v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 10:16 am
A herd of buffalo can only move as fast as the slowest buffalo.. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 1:06 pm
Buffalo Field Campaign v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:23 am
The judge cited a 2006 New York County Civil Court case, Poyck v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
LAW OFFICE OF TODD ALDINGER, ESQ., BUFFALO (TODD ALDINGER OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
LAW OFFICE OF TODD ALDINGER, ESQ., BUFFALO (TODD ALDINGER OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:00 am
The court opined that "It is hornbook law that one who objects to the act of an administrative agency must exhaust available administrative remedies before being permitted to litigate [its objection] in a court of law," citing Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 NY2d 52.* Addressing Facility's contention that it had raised a constitutional challenge alleging that OMIG exceeded its authority and violated Article III, §1, of the New York State… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:30 am
A discrepancy between the contemporaneous incident reports and the applicant’s testimony at the subsequent hearing presents a credibility issue to be resolved by the hearing officerBevilacqua v DiNapoli, 2016 NY Slip Op 07077, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPolice Captain Larry A. [read post]
